top of page
News image template
Sarah Taaffe-Maguire, business and economics reporter
Sep 8
The UK's trade ban with Israeli settlements explained

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said both imports of goods and some services to and from Israeli settlements would come under the ban. The UK - along with major allies such as France and Canada - has followed the path of some European neighbours as settler expansion and violence ramp up in the West Bank. While trade in services between the UK and settlements is not outlawed entirely, advertising illegal settlements for sale will be prohibited. Politics latest: Follow live Also promised was "action" against specific companies and individuals which provide construction, infrastructure financing, or real estate services. However, Mr Miliband didn't name any specific person or entity. "So to those who finance or facilitate illegal settlements, let me say this. You will face the full force of UK sanctions," he said in the Commons. It follows the trade minister saying in July that the government had been working on a prohibition and was keen for it to also cover trade in services. Chris Bryant said he was concerned about companies in the UK providing mortgages for settlement buildings, acting as estate agents for properties there, or giving accountancy or legal services to the areas. The foreign secretary said the UK would also impose new sanctions on "extremist settlers" and refuse applications for arms sales and other exports that "materially contribute to the occupation" - though it's unclear what that phrase encompasses. What's not included? Notable for its absence was a blanket ban on trade in services as had been endorsed by Mr Bryant in July. Similarly, there was no mention of a universal ban on exports to settlements, just on imports. How will it work? Rather than using the existing sanctions rules, Mr Miliband said the government would create a "new comprehensive sanctions regime" to give effect to the embargo. He said the regime would be in place within six to nine months but didn't mention how the measures would be enforced. The state currently enacts such measures via the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act (SAMLA). Why is this happening? Pressure has been mounting on the government to take action as Israeli settlements grow and Palestinians face increased violence and intimidation. There have been escalating attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank and, in the past weeks, some have had homes besieged. Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory have rapidly expanded in recent years, with more planned by the Israeli government. Latest plans by the Israelis to build about 1,200 homes, as part of the E1 programme of expansion in the West Bank, were described by Mr Miliband as an "unacceptable and destructive act". Such outposts have long been opposed by the UK government, which believes them to be a breach of international law and a threat to a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. Also adding pressure is its July 2024 advisory opinion from the UN's top court, which said Israel's presence in the occupied territories was "unlawful". The International Court of Justice (ICJ) said all UN member states were under an obligation "not to recognise as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the state of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation". What are settlements? A settlement is an Israeli-built village, town or city in occupied Palestinian territory - either in the West Bank or East Jerusalem. Creating settlements can involve confiscating land and displacing Palestinians, which is illegal under the Geneva Convention, as is the moving of Israeli civilians into territory Israel occupies. Mr Miliband told the Commons there was "ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists" - with "houses bulldozed, roads and public infrastructure destroyed, families displaced from their homes". Israel disputes this, saying it cannot be classed as an occupying power, as no country owned the land before it took the territory in 1967, and it has not transferred its population to the territories; people move freely. Contrary to the UN, Israel officially recognises and administers some settlements. Has this been done before? Spain, Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands have announced similar trade prohibitions previously. But by implementing an embargo that spans both imports and exports of goods and some services, the UK has one of the most comprehensive bans in Europe. Ireland and Belgium, for example, have only prevented trade in goods. The foreign secretary said France and Canada would also ban trade from illegal settlements - and that Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Poland, Portugal and Sweden had pledged to "support further action". What do opponents say? Speaking ahead of the UK government announcement, Israeli president Isaac Herzog said it would be a "grave miscalculation, a decision that will fall on the wrong side of history". He said sanctions would "directly harm" Palestinians, "robbing them of business and employment". Shadow foreign secretary Tom Tugendhat told the Commons that illegal settlements were "wrong" and that "outrageous" crimes were being committed. However, he said the sanctions would "harm innocents" because the Israeli and Palestinian economies are "too interconnected". The US government hasn't yet officially responded. However, America's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said before the announcement that sanctions were "irrational" and he did not "understand what it's supposed to achieve". Other opponents are Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), which said the ban is "practically impossible and will become a de facto boycott of all of Israel, which would be deeply damaging to the UK national interest, the British Jewish community, and Palestinian workers". Meanwhile, polling by YouGov suggested one in two Britons backed a ban.

News image template
Gemma Peplow, culture and entertainment reporter
Sep 8
Noel and Liam Gallagher unite for Oasis's UK documentary premiere - here's what we learn from the film

It is something we see several times throughout Don't Look Back In Anger as the film covers several of those on-stage arrivals from the 2025 tour. At the first, in Cardiff, Noel seems guarded, unsure of the gesture of brotherly affection. By the time the band are playing in Dublin a few weeks later, he is laughing, relaxed, as the pair hold hands. For years, Oasis fans thought they would never see anything like this. Don't Look Back In Anger, written by Steven Knight (Peaky Blinders) and directed by Will Lovelace and Dylan Southern, was a chance to tell the story of how the brothers got here. Towards the end of the film, we see Noel and Liam interviewed together for the first time since before the band's split in 2009. "All the little things that used to annoy us about each other have gone away," says Noel at one point. "It's not a power struggle anymore." He describes Liam as "delightful" - a word he says he never thought he'd use in that context - and also praises his talents as a frontman. "I'd forgotten what he means to people. The songs are one thing but then there's what he means to them." Liam is equally complimentary: "I'm glad to see Noel doing it again. They're his songs... they come from his soul. He deserves it and the songs deserve it." The brothers are in contact "way more" now than they ever were before the band's split, they say. "It was all forgiven without saying a word," says Noel. Unanswered questions This is what we find out about the brothers' relationship now and there's a genuine sense of friendship. What Don't Look Back In Anger doesn't do is answer the question of how it came to be. How do you go from Liam calling Noel a potato (and worse) on Twitter, and Noel saying he would never perform with his little brother again, to holding hands on stage? The answers to these questions remain off-camera. The documentary is titled Don't Look Back In Anger after all, so maybe that was always the intention. This film is about those 2025 shows, documenting fans' disbelief at first, and then the euphoria, the tears, the nostalgia and everything the tour encapsulated. First, there is a quick recap of Oasis's rise to fame, including the huge Knebworth gigs in 1996, followed by growing tensions and the split just before they were due to perform in Paris in 2009. Cut to the reunion and the first rehearsal with both brothers together. Noel and the rest of the band had been rehearsing for a few weeks before Liam's presence was required. "I was born with one fatal flaw in my character," says Noel beforehand. "I cannot forgive people." We also hear from Liam: "I'm not a yes man... I'm f****** Liam Gallagher." Could this reunion, as many cynics believed, implode before the brothers even made it on stage? The first rehearsal Noel paces as they wait. Then in Liam strolls, parka on, strut unmistakable. There are no hugs, no overt affection, no mention of what has been said before. They just get on with it. When he leaves without announcement, again, there is no fanfare. "I'm not sure whether our kid's enjoying himself," says Noel, mystified. But Liam is taking it very seriously. He's given up cigarettes and alcohol, he says, because the songs "need to be treated with the utmost respect". When the documentary gets to that first show in Cardiff, you see what this means to the audience. From here, the film tells the story of the tour through songs, and the stories of fans all around the world - from the woman in Brazil who named her dog Bonehead, to a survivor of the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing. These gigs brought bucket-hatted fans old and young together in a way even Noel says he could not quite believe. "I certainly wasn't prepared for the intense outpouring of joy and tears," he says at one point. He had to turn his back to the crowd several times during the tour to stop his own emotions from getting the better of him, he says later. The sense of community, the collective joy is what the filmmakers capture here. From Manchester's "Gallagher Hill" to South Korea, the lyrics are sung back to the band by tens of thousands of people in the crowds, and fans all have stories about what those words mean to them. The brothers' children met for the first time during the tour, the documentary reveals, and they were all there to show support at the premiere, along with musicians including Johnny Marr and Bobby Gillespie, and band members Bonehead, Gem Archer and Andy Bell. Will there be another tour? There is nothing in the film about these other band members, save for praise from Noel for Paul "Bonehead" Arthurs; Oasis's original guitarist, he quit in 1999, 10 years before Noel called time on the band. "He's a massive, massive part not only of the sound but of the dynamic" of the band. When he left... we spent 11 years chasing that sound. He is the f****** sound of Oasis." There is also no real mention of the eyewatering ticket pricing many were stung by, which threatened to overshadow the launch of the tour. Presumably because, by the time the gigs rolled around, all was forgiven. "Was it worth the £40,000 you paid for a ticket?" Liam joked at the Cardiff show, and was met by a roar of "yeah!" back. In the documentary, we hear him joke again: "There are no cheap seats... sorry about that." Just as Oasis's best songs were about defiant optimism, Don't Look Back In Anger runs with positivity. With so much turmoil in the world, more than ever now, people "want to escape", the brothers say, and the film captures that feeling - for those two hours or so, life was joyous, uncomplicated. So the documentary is all about the music, the brothers' relationship now, and the fans. "It's about 'we' and 'us'," as Noel puts it when describing the songs and why they have endured. The fans have always played a huge part in Oasis's story. With all signs pointing to another tour (if the band's now daily teasers on social media are anything to go by), it feels like "we" could be doing it all again very soon.

News image template
Sarah Taaffe-Maguire, business and economics reporter
Sep 8
The UK's trade ban with Israeli settlements explained

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said both imports of goods and some services to and from Israeli settlements would come under the ban. The UK - along with major allies such as France and Canada - has followed the path of some European neighbours as settler expansion and violence ramp up in the West Bank. While trade in services between the UK and settlements is not outlawed entirely, advertising illegal settlements for sale will be prohibited. Politics latest: Follow live Also promised was "action" against specific companies and individuals which provide construction, infrastructure financing, or real estate services. However, Mr Miliband didn't name any specific person or entity. "So to those who finance or facilitate illegal settlements, let me say this. You will face the full force of UK sanctions," he said in the Commons. It follows the trade minister saying in July that the government had been working on a prohibition and was keen for it to also cover trade in services. Chris Bryant said he was concerned about companies in the UK providing mortgages for settlement buildings, acting as estate agents for properties there, or giving accountancy or legal services to the areas. The foreign secretary said the UK would also impose new sanctions on "extremist settlers" and refuse applications for arms sales and other exports that "materially contribute to the occupation" - though it's unclear what that phrase encompasses. What's not included? Notable for its absence was a blanket ban on trade in services as had been endorsed by Mr Bryant in July. Similarly, there was no mention of a universal ban on exports to settlements, just on imports. How will it work? Rather than using the existing sanctions rules, Mr Miliband said the government would create a "new comprehensive sanctions regime" to give effect to the embargo. He said the regime would be in place within six to nine months but didn't mention how the measures would be enforced. The state currently enacts such measures via the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act (SAMLA). Why is this happening? Pressure has been mounting on the government to take action as Israeli settlements grow and Palestinians face increased violence and intimidation. There have been escalating attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank and, in the past weeks, some have had homes besieged. Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory have rapidly expanded in recent years, with more planned by the Israeli government. Latest plans by the Israelis to build about 1,200 homes, as part of the E1 programme of expansion in the West Bank, were described by Mr Miliband as an "unacceptable and destructive act". Such outposts have long been opposed by the UK government, which believes them to be a breach of international law and a threat to a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. Also adding pressure is its July 2024 advisory opinion from the UN's top court, which said Israel's presence in the occupied territories was "unlawful". The International Court of Justice (ICJ) said all UN member states were under an obligation "not to recognise as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the state of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation". What are settlements? A settlement is an Israeli-built village, town or city in occupied Palestinian territory - either in the West Bank or East Jerusalem. Creating settlements can involve confiscating land and displacing Palestinians, which is illegal under the Geneva Convention, as is the moving of Israeli civilians into territory Israel occupies. Mr Miliband told the Commons there was "ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists" - with "houses bulldozed, roads and public infrastructure destroyed, families displaced from their homes". Israel disputes this, saying it cannot be classed as an occupying power, as no country owned the land before it took the territory in 1967, and it has not transferred its population to the territories; people move freely. Contrary to the UN, Israel officially recognises and administers some settlements. Has this been done before? Spain, Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands have announced similar trade prohibitions previously. But by implementing an embargo that spans both imports and exports of goods and some services, the UK has one of the most comprehensive bans in Europe. Ireland and Belgium, for example, have only prevented trade in goods. The foreign secretary said France and Canada would also ban trade from illegal settlements - and that Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Poland, Portugal and Sweden had pledged to "support further action". What do opponents say? Speaking ahead of the UK government announcement, Israeli president Isaac Herzog said it would be a "grave miscalculation, a decision that will fall on the wrong side of history". He said sanctions would "directly harm" Palestinians, "robbing them of business and employment". Shadow foreign secretary Tom Tugendhat told the Commons that illegal settlements were "wrong" and that "outrageous" crimes were being committed. However, he said the sanctions would "harm innocents" because the Israeli and Palestinian economies are "too interconnected". The US government hasn't yet officially responded. However, America's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said before the announcement that sanctions were "irrational" and he did not "understand what it's supposed to achieve". Other opponents are Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), which said the ban is "practically impossible and will become a de facto boycott of all of Israel, which would be deeply damaging to the UK national interest, the British Jewish community, and Palestinian workers". Meanwhile, polling by YouGov suggested one in two Britons backed a ban.

News image template
No Writer
Sep 8
Ballon d'Or 2026: Harry Kane, Declan Rice, Jude Bellingham among nominees but no Cristiano Ronaldo

Harry Kane is among those in the running for the men's prize and is the bookmakers' favourite to be crowned. Kane scored 73 goals last season, enjoying one of the best campaigns of his career and he could become the first Englishman to win the Ballon d'Or since Michael Owen in 2001. Kane is joined the 30-man long-list by international teammates Jude Bellingham and Declan Rice. Transfer Centre LIVE! | Latest on YOUR PL club!Got Sky? Watch LIVE football on your phone📱Not got Sky? Get Sky Sports or stream with no contract on NOW Other Premier League stars like Bruno Fernandes, Erling Haaland, Gabriel and William Saliba are among the other players included. Lamine Yamal, Lionel Messi and Kylian Mbappe will be the likely challengers to Kane for the illustrious award but there is no nomination for Cristiano Ronaldo despite winning the Saudi Pro League with Al-Nassr. England stars Alessia Russo and Alex Greenwood are among 30 players nominated for the women's Ballon d'Or. Men's Ballon d'Or nomineesJude Bellingham (Real Madrid)Pau Cubarsi (Barcelona)Marc Cucurella (Real Madrid)Ousmane Dembele (PSG)Luis Diaz (Bayern Munich)Bruno Fernandes (Manchester United)Erling Haaland (Manchester City)Gabriel (Arsenal)Harry Kane (Bayern Munich)Acraf Hakimi (PSG)Lamine Yamal (Barcelona)Khvicha Kvaratskhelia (PSG)Marquinhos (PSG)Sadio Mane (Al Nassr)Lautaro Martinez (Inter)Kylian Mbappe (Real Madrid)Nuno Mendes (PSG)Lionel Messi (Inter Miami)Michael Olise (Bayern Munich)Joao Neves (PSG)William Pacho (PSG)Julian Quinones (Al Qadsia)Declan Rice (Arsenal)Rodri (Barcelona)Ferran Torres (PSG)Fabian Ruiz (PSG)William Saliba (Arsenal)Dayot Upamecano (Bayern Munich)Vinicius Jnr (Real Madrid)Vitinha (PSG)Women's Ballon d'Or nomineesEsmee Brugts (Barcelona)Klara Buhl(Bayern Women)Mariona Caldentey (Arsenal)Barbra Banda (Orlando Pride)Selma Bacha (Lyon)Scarlett Camberos (Club America)Temwa Chawinga (Kansas City Current)Kerstin Casparij (Manchester City)Cata Coll (Barcelona)Corventina Dumornay(Lyon)Caroline Graham Hansen (Barcelona)Alex Greenwood (Manchester City)Patri Guijarro (Barcelona)Pernille Harder (Bayern Munich)Yui Hasegawa (Manchester City)Rose Lavelle (FC Gotham)Mapi Leon (Barcelona)Lorena Leite (Kansas City Current)Manaka Matsukobo (Chelsea)Melvine Malard (Manchester Utd)Ewa Pajor (Barcelona)Vivianne Miedema (Manchester City)Alexia Putellas (London City Lionesses)Claudia Pina (Barcelona)Wendie Renard (Lyon)Alessia Russo (Arsenal)Momoko Tanikawa (Bayern Munich)Khadija Shaw (Manchester City)Tessa Wullaert (Como)Caroline Weir (Real Madrid)Men's Young Talent of the Year nomineesKerim Alajbegovic (RB Salzburg/Juventus)Ayyoub Bouaddi - (Lille/Manchester City)Pau Cubarsi - (Barcelona)Yan Diomande - (RB Leizig/Real Madrid)Lennart Karl - (Bayern Munich)Eli Junior Kroupi - (Bournemouth)Johan Manzambi - (Freiburg/Aston Villa)Lamine Yamal - (Barcelona)Ibrahim Maza - (Bayer Leverkusen)Warren Zaire-Emery - (PSG)Women's Young Talent of the Year nomineesVeerle Buurman - (Chelsea)Vicky Lopez - (Barcelona)Felicia Schroder (Real Madrid)Clara Serrajordi - (Barcelona)Lily Yohannes - (Lyon)Men's Goalkeeper of the Year nomineesYassine Bounou - (Al Hilal)Thibaut Courtois - (Real Madrid)Gregor Kobel - (Borussia Dortmund)Joan Garcia - (Barcelona)Edouard Mendy - (Al-Ahli)Emi Martinez - (Aston Villa/Chelsea)David Raya - (Arsenal)Vozinha - (GD Chaves/Colo-Colo)Unai Simon - (Athletic Bilbao)Matvey Safonov - (PSG)Women's Goalkeeper of the Year nomineesAnn-Katrin Berger - (Gotham FC)Cata Coll - (Barcelona)Hannah Hampton - (Chelsea)Lorena - (Kansas City)Ayaka Yamashita - (Manchester City)Women's Coach of the Year nomineesJonatan Giraldez - (Lyon)Andree Jeglertz - (Man City)Nils Nielsen - (Japan)Pere Romeu - (FCB)Elena Sadiku - (Celtic/BK Hacken)Men's Coach of the Year nomineesMikel Arteta - (Arsenal)Luis De La Fuente - (Spain)Unai Emery - (Aston Villa)Vincent Kompany - (Bayern Munich)Luis Enrique - (PSG)When is the Ballon d'Or ceremony? The 70th Ballon d'Or ceremony will take place on October 26, 2026 in London. How are the Ballon d'Or winners decided? The shortlist was compiled by a group of journalists from France Football working alongside French sports publication L'Equipe. For the men's Ballon d'Or prize, winners are decided by a voting system involving one journalist from each of the top 100 FIFA-ranked nations. Each journalist casts votes for their top 10 players from the 30-player shortlist. The 10 players are awarded 15, 12, 10, seven, five, four, three, two and one point based on where they rank. If players are tied on points, then whoever has the most first-place rankings from the 100 journalists finishes ahead on points. If that is tied, then it's the most second-places and so on. Journalists are encouraged to consider three factors when deciding their vote: Individual performances, decisive and impressive character Team performances and achievements Class and fair play For the women's Ballon d'Or, the same process applies but only journalists from the top-50 ranked nations are invited to vote.

News image template
No Writer
Sep 8
Thieves steal paintings from Renoir Museum on French Riviera

Two raiders ‌broke into the museum in Cagnes-sur-Mer through a hole they made in a ⁠fence a little before 6am on Tuesday, taking four paintings in all. The thieves dropped two of the paintings in the museum's garden as they were chased by police, but escaped with Portrait Of Madame Colonna Romano and Young Woman At the Well, local officials said. Cagnes-sur-Mer ​mayor Bryan Masson said the raid began at 5.48am when the museum's alarm went off, and police were on the scene five minutes later. He told local broadcaster Ici Azur and other media the gang was "well-equipped" and "well-informed", using an electric knife or saw to cut the fence and enter the museum via the ground floor before cutting the clips securing the artwork frames. The thieves were seen on CCTV entering the museum and taking four paintings, but the swift arrival of the police forced them "to flee in haste and helped limit the scale of the theft," he added. French regional newspaper Nice-Matin named the other stolen paintings as Portrait Of Madame Pichon (1895) and Coco Reading (1905), valuing the four artworks together at $10.5m (£7.7m), but these details have not been confirmed. Renoir's most valuable works ​have sold for millions at ​auctions in the past. All of the paintings are by the French painter and are visible on the museum's website. Mr Masson said ‌attacking ⁠the museum "is attacking ⁠a part of the history and heritage of Cagnes-sur-Mer. These actions are particularly serious". Police are investigating the theft. 'Difficult to sell' Christopher Marinello, chief executive at Art Recovery International, told Sky News the stolen paintings will be "very difficult to sell", predicting the thieves will look for buyers in Eastern Europe or Russia "where people tend to buy stolen items without doing proper due diligence". He said it's "very unlikely that these were stolen to order" and the proximity of the Mediterranean Sea "could be very problematic" for investigators. Leading Impressionist artist Renoir was one of the leading painters of the Impressionist group. La Loge (1874), La Parisienne (1874) and Dance at Le Moulin de la Galette (1876) are among his best-known pieces, ImpressionistArts website said. The Renoir Museum, which was closed on Tuesday after the raid, was set up in 1960 in Renoir's home in the town, near Nice on the French Riviera, where he died in 1919. The collection on display includes 13 of his works and some 40 sculptures, pieces of furniture and photographs. Read more:Oasis documentary premieresBaby's world-first treatmentTrump's plane warning to Canada Violent thefts increasing Art thieves in Europe are committing ​more violent robberies and specialist gangs have been replaced ⁠by ad hoc opportunists recruited through social media, pan-European police body Europol said last month. A prime example of this new trend was last October's break-in at the Louvre Museum in Paris, the agency said. Thieves threatened guards ​and visitors and stole €88 million (£76m) worth of jewels, such as Empress Eugenie's tiara. Last month, four Renaissance paintings by 15th-century painter Antonello da Messina were stolen from a museum in Sicily during the country's summer national holiday.

News image template
No Writer
Sep 7
Oasis raise concerns over auction of unheard recordings archive

The recordings, comprising 63 live shows, as well as soundchecks and more than 100 hours of rehearsals from the Gallagher brothers in the 1990s, are set to go under the hammer next month. They were collected by sound engineer Huw Richards, who worked with Oasis from the release of their 1994 debut album Definitely Maybe until 2001. But Littleton Auctions, who have called the sale a "once-in-a-generation opportunity for fans and collectors alike", has confirmed the band does not support it. Managing director Ben Homer said in a statement: "The Oasis camp is aware of the auction and has expressed concerns, which is entirely understandable given the scale and significance of the material. "We're handling everything with full transparency and proper legal process. "Our focus is simply on presenting these items responsibly, with verified provenance, and allowing collectors and institutions to engage with an important part of British music history." The tracks, part of the wider collection dubbed The Desk Tapes, were recorded by Richards himself, who was the front-of-house sound engineer during the band's mid-1990s peak. After joining Oasis' crew in 1995, he worked with them on some of their biggest concerts, including the Knebworth dates in August 1996. He recorded the tapes directly from the desk, with Littleton Auctions calling it "the only master archive of its kind in existence". The recordings are being brought to sale by Huw's son Owain Richards, along with other items including internal tour itineraries, original setlists, a used Epiphone guitar and an original Kangol Oasis Tour parka. Richards said: "Dad labelled everything, recorded everything and backed it all up to cassette, over and over. "I grew up listening to these recordings. "Oasis were part of the family as much as they were part of the culture." Read more from Sky News:Four murder arrests after baby dies while camping with familyNewborn baby's nail infection led to brain tumour diagnosis He said that after the tapes had "been in my care" over the past two decades, it now "feels like the right time to pass them on to people who'll understand exactly what they are". The Times has reported that any buyer would not be able to commercialise the archive without the co-operation of the band, as Oasis retain the intellectual property rights. The Oasis auction will take place online and in person on 3 October. The Gallaghers made an appearance at the Venice Film Festival on Saturday ahead of the world premiere of their documentary Oasis: Don't Look Back In Anger. The project, written by Peaky Blinders' Steven Knight, is part concert film and part documentary, and follows the band on their reunion tour that began in Cardiff in July last year.

News image template
No Writer
Sep 6
'Get a life': Jenrick mocks protester after Reform party conference scuffle

No Description

News image template
No Writer
Sep 8
Ross Wilson: Newcastle chief reveals club prepared for Eddie Howe exit in summer that 'never felt chaotic'

Howe's shock resignation in July led to the swift appointment of Matthias Jaissle, who has enjoyed an unbeaten start to his reign. Howe's exit was part of a turbulent summer for the Magpies which also included the departures of key players Bruno Guimaraes, Sandro Tonali and Anthony Gordon. Transfer Centre LIVE! | Newcastle news & transfers⚫⚪Newcastle fixtures & scores | FREE Newcastle highlights▶️Got Sky? Watch Premier League games LIVE on your phone📱Not got Sky? Latest Sky Sports deals or stream PL games with no contract📺 Toon chief Wilson revealed Howe's resignation was not "painful" because of their Jaissle contingency, but Guimaraes' £75m move to Arsenal was not "part of the plan". Wilson said: "Eddie is an exceptionally talented coach and at some point that meant he was probably going to do something else and we had to be prepared for that. "It didn't feel painful. Clearly the timing was not one we had planned for. But we had a plan in place which is why we executed it as quickly as we did. "It might have caught some people off guard, but the reason we could move so quickly on it was because we had prepared for a number of months." Wilson added: "I think we want Newcastle United to be a club with anticipation and excitement. If we're not it probably means we're doing it wrong. "[This summer] never felt chaotic inside. There is no point us pretending otherwise - we did not want to lose Bruno Guimaraes. That was really disappointing that we got to that place in the end. "We were happy where we got to in terms of numbers but that was not part of our plan. But everything else that happened during the window was part of the plan." 'Trading an important part of Newcastle plan' Wilson believes success for Newcastle rests on them being a trading club going forwards after a summer of fluctuating fortunes in the transfer window. Newcastle raised nearly £250m in player sales but signed eight players aged 24 or under, with much enthusiasm over the big-money arrivals of Nico Gonzalez and Matias Fernandez-Pardo. "If you want to be a successful club in the Premier League, you have to trade players and if you don't the chances are you won't be a successful club in the Premier League," said Wilson. "This is what we've got to do. And if you don't do it, then just keep the squad you've got and forevermore they'll grow old, achieve less and leave for nothing." The outlook is shaped by Newcastle being fined £5.2m for breaching UEFA's financial sustainability regulations, with £6m suspended pending future compliance. They have not qualified for Europe this season, and chief financial officer Simon Capper has forecast the club will be "compliant" with the more relaxed Premier League financial rules. Woltemade exit allowed Fernandez-Pardo signing Wilson and Capper also revealed that club-record signing Nick Woltemade had to leave on loan to allow the arrival of Fernandez-Pardo. On Deadline Day, Woltemade, who joined last summer in a £69m deal, moved to Juventus on loan, with Newcastle confirming the £51m signing of Fernandez-Pardo from Lille. Wilson said: "Because we try to link things together, the ultimate deal for Fernandez-Pardo was only possible because we did the Woltemade deal. The ultimate [Fernandez-Pardo] deal. "If we didn't do the Woltemade deal, we might have done another deal, but that's what we mean by linking things together." Capper added: "So the conversation we were having internally was, 'If you want to do that [sign Fernandez-Pardo] you're going to have to give me something back…otherwise we'll be in a position we're not comfortable with'. "We managed to get that. That's how we work together as a group, as a senior management team, to deliver the best result we can out of a transfer window."

bottom of page