top of page
970x250.png
News image template
No Writer
Apr 24
Man jailed for religiously aggravated rape of Sikh woman

John Ashby, 32, was sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court, where he had faced charges of rape, robbery, intentional strangulation and religiously aggravated assault in connection with the incident in Walsall last October. The trial opened on Monday, where prosecutors said Ashby "targeted" the woman after they were riding on the same bus, before he followed her and entered her home. He changed his pleas to guilty on Tuesday after being told to "sort your s*** out" in a confrontation in court. Passing sentence on Friday, High Court judge Mr Justice Pepperall told Ashby, of no fixed address, that remarks made during the attack "reveal you as a deeply unpleasant racist and Islamophobe". He also addressed the victim and her partner in court, telling them: "I have nothing but admiration for your bravery. I hope that with time, love and support you are able to rebuild your lives." The court heard extracts from "harrowing" body-worn police footage that showed the young woman, who has a legal right to anonymity, being comforted by a female officer after the assault. Ashby said he was 'British master' She said her attacker had called her a "bloody Muslim b****", and that she had been raped in a bathroom by the intruder, who claimed to be a "British master". In a video interview played to the trial, the victim told police: "He had a stick in his hand. I said 'who are you' and I started screaming. "He switched off the light. He said 'I just want fun with you'. He said 'you are a f****** Muslim b****', I said 'I am not a Muslim, I am a Sikh'." Prosecutors told the court there could be no doubt that Ashby was the man who attacked the woman, citing DNA evidence, fingerprints found on a vape and the fact the victim pointed him out at an identity parade. During sentencing remarks, the judge described how Ashby had suffered previous mental health issues and "psychotic episodes" but said they were caused "by your own voluntary actions in abusing illicit drugs". "I have no doubt whatever that you are a very dangerous man and that you pose a significant risk to women," he added. I'm finally free, says victim The court heard a victim personal statement from the woman, who is in her 20s, who said the attack "changed every part of my life" but now she was "finally free" after watching Ashby admit his guilt "I now no longer feel trapped. I can begin to live my life again," the statement added. Read more from Sky News:Charge over headteacher's murderFormer health boss admits embezzlementMan, 92, charged with murder Ashby confronted in court On Tuesday, Ashby appeared to say "this is bulls***" during the proceedings and a member of the Sikh community angrily responded by confronting Ashby in the dock: "You're the bulls***. You need to sort your s*** out." The defendant responded by telling the man to "get the f*** out of my face," before the judge adjourned the case and when the court reconvened, Ashby changed his pleas. After the trial's conclusion, the man apologised to the judge, who chose not to pursue contempt of court proceedings. Attack was 'deeply disturbing' Senior crown prosecutor Rav Dhillon, from the Crown Prosecution Service, described the attack as "deeply disturbing" and "driven by religious hatred". In a statement, she said: "John Ashby targeted a complete stranger, subjected her to prolonged violence and religiously motivated abuse, and left her traumatised. "The fact Ashby initially denied these charges before changing his plea part-way through the trial reflects the strength of the evidence against him." Meanwhile, Dabinderjit Singh, from the Sikh Federation lobby group, said the sentence would send "a strong signal to all racists that carry out violent attacks" and expressed hope it would "help the victim through this trauma".

News image template
Sarah Taaffe-Maguire, business and economics reporter
Apr 23
Shareholders 'overwhelmingly' approve Paramount takeover of Warner Bros

The shareholders, who own Warner Bros Discovery (WBD), voted "overwhelmingly" to approve the adoption of the merger agreement with Paramount, WBD said. A merger of WBD and Paramount Skydance is one of the biggest media deals in history, with significant impacts on TV, filmmaking and the possible future of the cinema. Money blog: McDonald's to increase prices A Paramount-Warner combination encompasses two of Hollywood's five legacy studios. In total, the deal has been valued at $110bn (£81.4bn) - $31 per WBD share and additional fees. Thursday's vote was described as "another key milestone toward completing this historic transaction" by WBD. The deal, it said, "will deliver exceptional value to our stockholders" and will be completed between July and September this year, subject to regulatory approval. "We will continue to work with Paramount to complete the remaining steps in this process that will create a leading, next-generation media and entertainment company," the statement continued. While both Democrats and Republicans have raised concerns the merger could result in higher prices and fewer choices for customers, WBD on Thursday said the combined company will "expand consumer choice and benefit the global creative talent community". Why does it matter? A combined Warner Bros and Paramount has huge potential to reshape Hollywood and change film and TV production. Paramount Skydance will now own CNN, as well as CBS News, sparking concern about concentrating news services within a small number of companies. The company is also headed by David Ellison, the son of Trump ally Larry Ellison, who put up tens of billions of dollars to satisfy funding guarantees for the WBD bid. Cinema operators have also expressed concern that combining ​the large Hollywood studios could cost jobs and reduce the ​number ⁠of films released in theatres. Harry Potter, Superman and Barbie movies - as well as hit TV series like Succession - will join Paramount's content library. Paramount's line-up of titles include Top Gun and The Godfather as well as the Paramount+ streaming service.

News image template
Beth Rigby, political editor
Apr 24
Green ambitions, leaving NATO and apologising over breast hypnosis claim - Polanski's success brings more scrutiny

There's a bank of cameras, cars honking as they drive past and plenty of handshakes following the leader of the Greens as he walks up the high street in Levenshulme. Politics Hub: Follow the latest He's here to talk about rejuvenating the high street in this pocket of Manchester that turned from red to green in the Gorton and Denton by-election in February. It caused a not-so-minor political earthquake on the left and Polanski is hoping to shake up a lot more in May's elections. He tells me, as we walk down the high street in the sunshine, that Labour are going to have a "disastrous" set of local elections and that he thinks Keir Starmer will be out of Number 10 in the next couple of months. "I don't see how he survives this set of elections. "I just feel like there's been a sense it hasn't happened for a long time because there was no obvious successor, but you can't keep going like that. "At some point you have to say it can't get any worse, and actually I think there's a general consensus that his poll ratings have bottomed out as low as they can go, to the point that may be the Mandelson stuff doesn't affect him as it should." 'Greens will replace Labour' In London, Polanski could potentially win four boroughs that have long been Labour - Hackney, where Polanski lives, Lambeth, Lewisham and Waltham Forest, according to a YouGov MRP poll. Across England, Polanski's Greens are expected to gain hundreds of council seats. He tells me the Greens are going to replace Labour. When I ask him who, should Starmer be forced out of office, he'd find the most difficult Labour character to face as his successor, that it would be Andy Burnham. "We'd be in a similar political space, but as a member of this country, I'd much rather have someone more progressive leading the government than Keir Starmer." Got a question for Beth Rigby about this or any other story? Ask here But for all the talk of a green wave, Polanski's Greens seem a very long way from replacing Labour. Rather like Corbyn's Labour, Polanski's eco-populism brand has energised younger, urban and ethnic minority voters. Party membership has grown from 50,000 when he was running for party leader to over 225,000 in the eight months since he's had the job. It's impressive on any measure. The question for Polanski, as it was for Farage's Reform as it began the transition from being a party of protest to one seriously vying for power, is how to put together policies and people to appeal to a wider group of voters: when I sat down with him in the local park in Levenshulme, I wanted to know how the Green Party bridges that gap. For now, the Greens seem to be following a 50-seat strategy in a general election, pitching themselves as an alternative left party, rather than building a broader coalition by picking off voters in more traditionally Conservative areas - Herefordshire, Rossendale, Amber Valley - concerned about the environment - the type of coalition of different voters a party needs to win marginal seats. When I ask Polanski what he's going to do to appeal to more voters, he tells me that part of it is the way the party communicates with voters. "They all know we want to protect the environment and tackle the climate crisis, that's never going to change. But I think people are less aware about our policies to tax multimillionaires and billionaires. To really tackle the fact that people have low wages and high bills." 👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈 Where he is less comfortable is talking about defence. Polling shows that over one in two voters don't trust the Greens on defence - and when I ask Polanski about his approach to NATO, he veers away from the party policy to remain a member of NATO, he gives me a much more nuanced answer when I ask him if he wants to leave the security alliance. "I want us to create an alternative alliance to have that discussion." When I press him again about wanting to leave, he tells me: "Not immediately, once we get an alternative alliance with our European neighbours, so we can ensure our military, our security, then to start working towards that alternative alliance." His argument is that NATO is not working because Donald Trump is being "deliberately antagonistic" and that European allies should build an alternative alliance. But on what those timeframes of exiting NATO and building this new alliance with European countries (already in NATO) are, he's less clear. It doesn't seem to me to be very thought-through policy on a matter of such importance, as Western allies face wars on two fronts - in Ukraine and the Middle East. The Polanski factor There's also Polanski himself. The leader undoubtedly has huge appeal, knows how to work social media in the attention economy and is a fluent communicator. But here are questions around his leadership and judgement. This week, he provoked alarm among the Jewish community when he said of the horrific wave of anti-semitic attacks: "There's a conversation to be had about whether it's a perception of unsafety or whether it's actual unsafety, but neither are acceptable." That phrase - the "perception of unsafety" - was seized upon by many in the Jewish community as somehow downplaying the rise of antisemitism Jewish people are experiencing and the way the community is feeling. When I put that to Polanski, he told me: "Neither are acceptable, and that's why I said that. And look, this context is I'm one of five Jewish people who have ever led a political party in British history." Read more from Sky News:World Cup final tickets go on sale for $2.3m eachBabies held aloft at funeral of father shot in Israeli settler attack When I also put it to Polanski that for some talking of a "perception of unsafety" was somehow downplaying these attacks, he said: "Those people would be taking me out of context and doing it for their own particular political reasons. What I think I'm saying is very clear, that both arsons and dressing up an artificial image of a Jewish leader dressed as a Nazi is also unacceptable. One is actually making Jewish people unsafe, and one is a perception of unsafety. "Of course, as a Jewish man, I care about antisemitism." Keir Starmer said Polanski's comments were "disgraceful" as antisemitism was "very real" and "felt throughout the whole community". On his judgement, one other thing I could not shake was why he did an interview with the Sun newspaper in 2013, claiming he could hypnotise a woman into having bigger breasts. It was a long time ago, when he was 30 years old and before he was in politics - but when I dug out the article and read it, I found it such an odd thing to do and I wanted to understand why he did it. First, he told me the article was nonsense, but when I pushed back and pointed out that there were direct quotes from him in the article and he endorsed it a few days after it was published on a BBC radio show, he then admits "it was the Sun journalist's idea and I should have said no". "I wasn't a politician; I went along with the idea. I shouldn't have done it and that's what I've apologised for," he added. When I ask him what he says to those voters looking at this and women who might find it uncomfortable, he tells me: "I do appreciate you asking me the question because ultimately I do want to speak to those women, but that article doesn't represent me. It was a wrong thing to do to go along with a Sun journalist, that's why I apologised, that is why I'll continue to apologise. But I think when people look at my record as a politician, not just as leader of the Green Party, but the last few years as an elected member of the London Assembly, I've got a strong record of working with women on women's rights. "I understand how people can look at the history and go 'that was strange'. I often think about what Tony Benn said, which is 'I don't care where you came from, I care where you're going' and I stand by that apology, but I think most people are interested right now in what I and the Green Party are doing." Polanski tells me, for the record, he now doesn't believe that you can enlarge women's breasts through hypnotherapy. But what he does believe is that the Green Party is going to grow rapidly in the coming weeks and months. But with more success, more seats, more power, comes more scrutiny. Is Polanski and his party really ready for that? This interview is part of a series that Sky News will be conducting with party leaders ahead of the May elections.

News image template
No Writer
Apr 24
Gianluca Prestianni: Benfica winger handed six-match ban for discriminatory conduct towards Real Madrid's Vinicius Junior

Real Madrid's forward accused Prestianni of racially abusing him in February's Champions League tie. UEFA's statement indicated the punishment was for homophobic abuse. Three of those six matches are suspended for a two-year period and the ban also includes the one match Prestianni served as a provisional suspension in February. Therefore, unless he triggers the suspended three-match ban, he will only actually be sidelined for two further games. UEFA appointed an ethics and disciplinary investigator after the match, with the investigation having concluded Prestianni's conduct was homophobic rather than racist. UEFA said it had requested that FIFA extend the ban worldwide. It was reported in February that Prestianni had told UEFA he had used a homophobic slur rather than a racist one. Vinicius left the field and refused to return after Prestianni's comments, resulting in a stoppage in play that lasted 10 minutes. The incident could yet spark a law change, with the International Football Association Board (IFAB) set to meet in Canada next week ahead of FIFA Congress to further consider how players are dealt with if they cover their mouths to talk to an opponent in a confrontation. FIFA president Gianni Infantino said last month that a red card should result, telling Sky News: "If a player covers his mouth and says something, and this has a racist consequence, then he has to be sent off, obviously. "There must be a presumption that he has said something he shouldn't have said, otherwise he wouldn't have had to cover his mouth."

News image template
Dominic Waghorn - international affairs editor
Apr 24
Pentagon's Falklands email touches a nerve in Britain - and makes Charles's US visit even more challenging

Do so on the eve of a royal visit to the US and the blast is amplified. Buried in a 'Pentagon email', Reuters has today reported, there is an option suggesting American support for European imperial possessions is reviewed at some point in the future. The Falklands is only one of several territories mentioned. There is no suggestion at this stage of any concrete action. The suspicion is Pentagon paper pushers are drawing up ideas to salve the president's misplaced fury over NATO not doing more over Iran. But none of that has averted predictable hysteria erupting across Britain's news media. 'Bombshell' screamed many outlets, with one misreporting that the US president is already 'directing' the Pentagon to pull support over the South Atlantic islands. From tabloids to broadsheets, a full court effort to push readers buttons and mobilise British outrage over the issue. The reaction says a lot more about British insecurity over the Falklands than justifiable and genuine official concern over the story. But there are good reasons for the emotional reaction. The Falklands War remains a source of both patriotic pride and deep trauma in Britain. More than a thousand British personnel were killed or wounded. More were mentally scarred by what they witnessed there. In this small island nation most of us know someone who was involved. It was also a successful military operation, repelling invaders and reclaiming the territory. But with pride over that achievement there is also the knowledge that Britain could not pull it off again. The Falklands War is one of a number of high watermarks in the narrative of national malaise and decline. More importantly today's Reuters story touches a nerve because there have always been misgivings about America's conduct during the war. It was not the full throated support the British government would have hoped for from its special relationship ally. There was at first scepticism from the Reagan administration. A sense the British were embarked on a throwback to the Gilbert and Sullivan era of warfare and taking a massive gamble. Read more from Sky News:Ex-officer stripped of UK citizenshipWorld Cup final tickets on sale for $2.3m As the war progressed, the US moved from a more neutral position to lending military, intelligence and logistical support but it seemed all too reluctant to many on this side of the Atlantic. There is therefore plenty of scar tissue over the Falklands that this story threatens to unpick just on the eve of the King's visit to the US which is deeply contentious already. 'Trophy guest' Charles We were already going to have to witness King Charles being shown off like a trophy guest by a vain and erratic US president enmired in endless controversies. From allegations of personal and family corruption, to starting a war that's jeopardised the entire global economy, to personally belittling the sacrifices and courage of British troops in Afghanistan. And it is that stinging and unforgivable insult that the monarch and the people he leads as commander in chief will remember most painfully as he is paraded around the States. What was already looking like a very difficult trip for King Charles requiring a whole box of nose clips has just got even more challenging. Nebulous as it is this Pentagon memo rakes over the coals of America's lacklustre support the last time Britain went to war alone and does nothing to ease the King's ordeal.

News image template
No Writer
Apr 24
'Significant amount' of child abuse images recovered from iCloud account of US singer D4vd, say prosecutors

More details of the alleged offences emerged at a court hearing in California on Thursday, just days after the 21-year-old, whose real name is David Burke, pleaded not guilty to all the charges against him. The body of Celeste Rivas Hernandez, 14, from Lake Elsinore in California, was found in two bags in his Tesla that had been towed from the Hollywood Hills while he was on tour. On Thursday, prosecutors outlined how the investigation was progressing, stating that a "significant amount" of child sex abuse images were found on his iCloud storage account. "Today it's been exactly one year since the death of Celeste... We're eager to set this case for trial," deputy district attorney Beth Silverman told the court. She said the evidence includes the contents of his phone and iCloud accounts, items seized from many search warrants and a huge amount of forensic material. The prosecution has claimed Burke had been sexually abusing Celeste Rivas Hernandez for at least a year, starting when she was 13. It is alleged that he killed her on or around 23 April 2025, after she threatened to report the relationship, and dismembered her body about two weeks later. Burke arrived in a Los Angeles courtroom handcuffed and wearing orange jail clothes. The judge set out a four-to-five-day preliminary evidentiary hearing for 1 May. He pleaded not guilty on Monday to first-degree murder, lewd and lascivious acts with a person under 14 and mutilating a dead body. On Wednesday, the LA County medical examiner determined that the girl died from two penetrating wounds to her upper body, but investigators did not determine how she was injured. Read more from Sky News:Who is in control of the strait?Trump threatens 'big tariff'Trump hits out at Harry Her parents, Jesus Rivas and Mercedes Martinez, made their first public statement in the case on Tuesday, calling their daughter "a beautiful, strong girl who loved to sing and dance". "All we want is justice for Celeste," they added. In a rare move, the singer is exercising his right in California to have the preliminary evidence hearing within 10 court days of his initial court appearance, when the charges were disclosed. The prosecution accepted it was working on an incredibly tight timeline for the hearing, which usually comes many months after defendants are arrested and charged. Sky News' US partner NBC News reported that prosecutors are seeking three enhancements to the singer's murder charge: lying in wait, financial gain and murdering a witness to an investigation. D4vd, pronounced "David" is known for his blend of indie rock, R&B and lo-fi pop and gained success with his 2022 hit "Romantic Homicide".

News image template
No Writer
Apr 24
Starmer 'put a nuclear bomb' under Mandelson row by sacking Olly Robbins

The prime minister fired the former Foreign Office chief last week over his decision not to tell him Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting. 👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈 Speaking on Electoral Dysfunction, Baroness Harman said the move "has made the whole thing blow up". "People in the party out in the country are thinking we wish he hadn't fired him, however much justification he had because he's put a nuclear bomb under the whole thing," she said. "He wouldn't have had to do the statement in the House of Commons. We wouldn't have had all this evidence to the select committee if he hadn't had fired Olly Robbins." "He could have done all the investigations and then possibly done due process of disciplining and firing Olly Robbins, but not actually a summary dismissal, which has made the whole thing blow up." Baroness Harman added Mandelson was "clearly the wrong appointment and a dangerous appointment for the UK to be making". Read more from Sky News:World Cup final tickets go on sale for $2.3m eachBabies held aloft at funeral of father shot in Israeli settler attack The row over Mandelson's vetting has consumed the government for the past week. The prime minister has claimed Sir Olly should have told him that UK Security Vetting (UKSV) had recommended against appointing Mandelson as UK ambassador to the US. But Sir Olly says it was down to him, as head of the Foreign Office, to decide whether to give Mandelson security clearance - and that UKSV considered it a borderline case. Sir Keir is once again facing a leadership crisis. All major political party leaders have called for him to resign, as have two backbench Labour MPs.

News image template
No Writer
Apr 23
Premier League Darts: Luke Littler beats Jonny Clayton and silences Liverpool crowd to close gap at top of table

Clayton is still in top spot in the Premier League with four regular weeks remaining on 32 points, but Littler is now just three points behind on 29. Gerwyn Price sits in third spot on 19 points, with Michael van Gerwen in fourth on 18 points. Premier League darts: Latest schedule and results ✅Darts in 2026: Key dates, calendar, results 📅Got Sky? Watch on the Sky Sports app 📱Not got Sky? Get instant access with NOW 📺 Gian van Veen is then next in line on 14 points, while defending champion Luke Humphries is in sixth on 13 points, with the race for Finals Night really hitting crunch time. The win marks Littler's fourth nightly win of his campaign and the Manchester native spent his night defying the jeers of the partisan Liverpool audience who were on his opponent's side throughout the evening. However, Littler stayed strong throughout, especially on the doubles, and sealed a big win in his quest to go into Finals Night in top spot. "It was a good night. I'm very happy with myself," Littler told Sky Sports. "Usually the doubling is not there, but I'm very thankful it was tonight. A lot of crucial doubles at crucial times. "I'm very close to Jonny now, three points off. I'm going to go chasing - I want to finish top once again - and if it's not to be, it's not to be. But there's still four weeks to go." In the final against Clayton, Littler raced into a 5-0 lead as he denied the Welshman any opportunity to get into the contest. In the first three legs Clayton's only checkout chances came on bullseye. Clayton managed to stop the rot to ensure he did not suffer a whitewash defeat but that only delayed Littler's victory by one leg. Littler imperious to overcome MVG, Humphries Littler defied an imperious display from Michael van Gerwen as he took the deciding leg in a 6-5 semi-final. The match was a display of vintage Van Gerwen with nine maximums, 71 per cent on the doubles, and a 107.54 average for the Dutchman but somehow Littler managed to hang on, change his darts, and go from 3-1 down to showing off imperious finishing. Even after Littler's fight back, it looked like the match was Van Gerwen's to take when he broke Littler's throw with an 11-darter to move 5-4 in front and give himself the opportunity to throw for the match. However, Littler made sure to break straight back, let out a celebration, and take the game all the way. The world No 1 then found a 180 at the most pivotal moment of the final leg to set himself up on 46, which he took out on tops before giving it large to the crowd. Luke Humphries was dealt a devastating blow to his Premier League finals night hopes following a 6-2 loss to Littler in the quarter-finals, seeing him walk away from Liverpool with no more points. While Humphries was scoring higher, his doubling was looser and down at just 18 per cent, allowing Littler to rattle off four legs as he raced into a 4-0 lead. Although Humphries managed to hold his throw twice, it was nowhere near enough as he fell to a seventh loss to the world No 1 in their last eight meetings. Clayton shows class in wins vs Van Veen, Bunting Clayton booked his spot in a sixth nightly final with a captivating last-leg 6-5 win over Gian van Veen. Van Veen looked in control as he went 2-0 up but the Welshman showed again that he is battle hardened as he lasted through a flurry of breaks of throw before eventually holding, during which he found a massive 121 checkout, to level the game at 3-3. After holding once again, 'The Ferret' clinched a sensational 156 checkout to move one leg from victory. That was not the end of the tale because Van Veen found a break of his own to level the scores at 5-5. However, after Van Veen missed a match dart at the bull, Clayton fired in a maximum and got down to D16, which he took under pressure for a shot at glory in Liverpool. Clayton also came through a nail-biting 6-5 quarter-final against hometown hero Stephen Bunting. The game went entirely with throw and, as he has done throughout the entire Premier League, Clayton grew into the game, stayed calm, and clinched the match on D8 in a nervy decider much to the disappointment of the partisan Liverpudlian crowd. Such is Clayton's consistency across this Premier League that the win marked his ninth quarter-final win across 12 weeks. Elsewhere, Van Veen started his night by winning a touch 6-4 battle against Gerwyn Price as he debuted new darts. Meanwhile, Van Gerwen started his night with a comprehensive 6-3 win over Josh Rock. Who will win this year's Premier League Darts? Luke Humphries will be defending his title and you can watch the action every single Thursday until May on Sky Sports. Stream darts and more top sport with NOW.

bottom of page