top of page
News image template
No Writer
Sep 18
Archbishop of Canterbury revokes award given to cleric who praised Osama bin Laden

Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi was given The Hubert Walter Award for Reconciliation and Interfaith Cooperation by Dame Sarah Mullally last Friday - the 25th anniversary of 9/11. However, Lambeth Palace withdrew the award after it emerged that in 2007, Mr Ashrafi said he would give bin Laden - the orchestrator of the September 11 terror attacks which claimed nearly 3,000 lives - the title Saifullah, which means "Sword of God", for "serving Muslims by waging jihad against infidels". An image of Mr Ashrafi receiving his award last week was accompanied by a caption saying he was being recognised "for his outstanding work as an ambassador of interfaith harmony in Pakistan".Lambeth Palace said it had rescinded the accolade, saying "previous comments made by Imam Ashrafi have come to light". In a statement, a spokesperson for Mr Ashrafi said his remarks had been reported "without their proper context" and that the comments were "not an endorsement of bin Laden". The statement said: "His [Mr Ashrafi's] longstanding record against terrorism and violent extremism should be considered when assessing such remarks." It added that Mr Ashrafi's comments on bin Laden in 2007 came amid protests in Pakistan against Sir Salman Rushdie being given a knighthood in Britain. Rushdie is the author of Satanic Verses, a book which some Muslims consider blasphemous. Mr Ashrafi told the Press Association he had been "giving an example" at the time to demonstrate the equivalence in offence caused to the Muslim community by the awarding of an honour to Rushdie. Read more from Sky News:Charles allegedly 'giddily elated' in phone call after Diana's deathPlea to avoid another 'inhumane' heatwave on NHS wards The National Secular Society chief executive Stephen Evans said he welcomed the withdrawal of the award, adding that "it is astonishing that it was given in the first place - on the anniversary of 9/11, no less". Mr Evans said: "This episode reveals not only appallingly poor judgement and inadequate due diligence, but a dangerous naivety about the religious figures legitimised through interfaith engagement."

News image template
Bethany Minelle, arts and entertainment reporter
Sep 17
Macklemore announces $1m donation after Ed Sheeran row - as stadium owner responds

US star Macklemore was dropped as the opening act on Sheeran's Loop tour following pro-Palestine comments he made during a show in New Jersey. On Monday, Gillette Stadium owner Robert Kraft barred the rapper from performing in the Massachusetts venue, saying he would not "provide a platform for hate speech". Sheeran's reported $2m donation follows Macklemore's earlier pledge to donate his $1m (£750,000) net earnings from Sheeran's upcoming tour to organisations supporting Palestinian people. Macklemore, 43, whose real name is Benjamin Haggerty, had challenged Mr Kraft, who did not allow him to perform at his Gillette Stadium as part of The Loop tour, to match his donation. It is not clear whether Mr Kraft has agreed to give the $2m, or to which organisations or charities the money would go. Sheeran is also yet to publicly confirm his donation. Following the controversy over Macklemore's removal from the tour, Sheeran's other support acts, including Danish band Lukas Graham and Billie Eilish's brother and musical collaborator, Finneas, subsequently pulled out in protest. In a statement posted on social media on Wednesday, Macklemore wrote: "With everything that has happened over the last 48 hours, I want to bring the conversation back to where it belongs: to the Palestinian people who are still being killed, still living under military occupation, and still fighting for their freedom. "I will be donating the entire $1 million of my net earnings from Ed Sheeran's Loop Tour to six organizations working directly to support the Palestinian people. And I invite Robert Kraft to match my donation. Whatever we disagree about, perhaps we can agree on this: Palestinian lives are worth protecting. A Palestinian life is no less valuable than any other life on this earth." It was Macklemore's second big announcement of the week, after revealing on Monday that he had been dropped from Sheeran's tour. Kraft: 'I believe deeply that all lives are worth protecting' Billionaire Mr Kraft, who is also the owner of the New England Patriots, posted his statement on Gillette Stadium's official X account shortly after Macklemore's statement. The 85-year-old wrote: "I have dedicated much of my life to building bridges between all people. I believe deeply that all lives are worth protecting. "Earlier today, before Macklemore challenged me to match his donation, Ed called me and asked me to commit $2 million to match his donation to aid in the region to fight this humanitarian crisis." He went on: "Ed now plans to reach out to other venue owners and our goal is to continue to work together to build bridges." Sheeran: 'I am not complicit' Earlier this week, Sheeran said he was "appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine", and described the "suffering and pain caused on both sides" as a human tragedy in a lengthy Instagram statement. Read more from Sky News:Real Madrid defend Mbappe and Vinicius' shirt stanceAcclaimed playwright and novelist dies aged 77 "I am not complicit," he said. "I have my personal views on this devastating conflict. Just because I choose not to speak publicly, it doesn't mean I don't have them, and it doesn't mean I don't care." Sheeran, who performed his song Perfect for the first dance at Mr Kraft's 2022 wedding, also said that "Macklemore coming off tour was the promoter's decision, it was not mine", adding that the rapper's contract for the tour "was with the promoter, not me". In a statement provided to Sky News' US partner network NBC News, Mr Kraft had said the decision on his venues was reached following Macklemore's comments and "a broader history of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery that we believe has been deeply offensive and hurtful to the Jewish community". He said: "This decision is not about diminishing the suffering of innocent Palestinians or denying anyone the right to advocate on their behalf. Their pain and loss are real."

News image template
No Writer
Sep 18
Is the government doing anything to stop AI killing us all?

The government needs to step up and properly regulate AI - that's what Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy tells the podcast - saying we can expect to hear more about it soon. She talks to Beth about the warnings that AI "could kill us all by the end of the decade". She also reflects on the online safety act - are the tech companies taking the UK government seriously? Beth also gets her take on the growing row over plans to house asylum seekers at a former military site near Piddington in Oxfordshire - the village of around 300 people who held a referendum this week to leave the UK. So, who gets the final say when national policy clashes with local democracy? Beth, Harriet and Ruth debate whether the government needs to rethink its plans on housing asylum seekers, why some communities feel unheard, and how immigration is becoming a defining battleground in British politics. Plus - we have an exciting announcement for our Dysfunctioners!

News image template
No Writer
Sep 17
England vs Sri Lanka: Jos Buttler breaks T20 runs record as Harry Brook's side clinch series win with game to spare

Banton was aided by useful cameos from skipper Harry Brook (23 off 8) and Jos Buttler (30 off 16) - the latter becoming the first player to make 15,000 T20 runs - as the home side sauntered past Sri Lanka's modest 145-9 with 7.5 overs to spare. The victory is England's 14th in succession over Sri Lanka, and their 22nd in their last 25 T20 internationals as Brook's side continue to go from strength to strength under the leadership of head coach Brendon McCullum and new white-ball mentor Kevin Pietersen. Latest Sky Sports deals or stream with no contract on NOWIs Harry Brook more talented than Kevin Pietersen?As it happened - England batter Sri Lanka in Cardiff to win T20 seriesListen to latest episode of the Sky Sports Cricket PodcastHow imperious England strolled to dominant series victory Sri Lanka's innings got off to a quick start, with openers Pathum Nissanka (37 off 21) and Lahiru Udara (21 off 20) putting on 55 runs without loss in their first five overs, but standout bowler Liam Dawson (3-32) took the wickets of Udara and Kamil Mishara (0) in successive balls to seize momentum from the batting side. Jamie Overton (2-23) eventually sent Nissanka packing after the powerplay, and it was not long before he struck again, forcing Kamindu Mendis (12 off 8) to chop on, with Dawson compounding Sri Lanka's pain by dismissing Shanaka just three balls later to leave the tourists reeling at 95-5 having been 56-0. A determined fifth-wicket resistance from skipper Charith Asalanka (31 off 31) and Wanindu Hasaranga (27 off 22) gave the tourists some needed respite, but the ever-dependable Adil Rashid (1-18) and the impressive Sonny Baker (1-15) dismissed both batters respectively in the space of six balls, before Jofra Archer took two wickets in the final over of the innings to leave Sri Lanka nine down having set England a target of 146. England began to make quick work of their opponents, with openers Buttler (30 off 16) and Aneurin Donald (21 off 13) putting on 50 runs in the first 25 balls before Dushmantha Chameera (1-29) and Eshan Malinga (1-27) dismissed the pair in the space of three balls. Brook, then, looked to up the pace, smashing three sixes in four balls, but was then caught by Malinga on the boundary, ending a sensational run of 311 runs without dismissal in T20 internationals for England. His side's middle order, though, were undeterred, with top scorer Banton combining with a useful Jordan Cox cameo (12 off 7) to finish off the chase and claim victory. Brook lauds 'special performance' - and 'ridiculous' Buttler! England white-ball captain Harry Brook, speaking to Sky Sports: "Tonight was a special performance, very clinical. Sri Lanka got off to a flier but the way we fought back with the ball was outstanding. "The way Dawson reads the game was outstanding, too. He is an awesome bowler and a great bloke. He uses all of his nous. "Everyone bowled phenomenally and the way Banton hits different parts of the ground with the bat was great to see. "[Buttler's 15,000 T20 runs] is ridiculous. Long may it continue. He has been phenomenal for 15 years and someone you want by your side and in the changing room." Watch England's third T20 vs Sri Lanka live on Sky Sports Cricket and Sky Sports Main Event from 2:30pm on Saturday. Latest Sky Sports deals or stream no contract with NOW. England vs Sri Lanka results and fixtures All times UK and Ireland; all games live on Sky Sports First T20 (Utilita Bowl) - England win by 119 runsSecond T20 (Thursday September 17) - England win by six wicketsThird T20 (Saturday September 19) - Old Trafford (2.30pm)First ODI (Tuesday September 22) - Durham (12.30pm)Second ODI (Thursday September 24) - Headingley (12.30pm)Third ODI (Sunday September 27) - The Kia Oval (10.30am)

News image template
No Writer
Sep 18
Robert F Kennedy Jr tells anti-vaccine activists they have a 'friend in the White House'

The US health secretary made the declaration at a conference of the Children's Health Defense, a non-profit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine advocacy for which Mr Kennedy previously served as chair and chief legal counsel. During his keynote speech at the event in Washington, Mr Kennedy told those in attendance that he was working to turn their priorities into policy. "Let me be clear: You have a strong and steadfast friend in the White House," he said. "We've accomplished in 19 months things that would have seemed unthinkable two years ago." Explained: Who is Donald Trump's health chief? Mr Kennedy also spoke about the Trump administration's moves to reduce the childhood vaccination schedule and reshape a key vaccine advisory board - measures that have since been halted by a judge. He also praised the US president for his attempts to overhaul vaccine guidance, including an executive order last month which called for a spacing out the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, defying recommendations from medical groups. On its website, the Children's Health Defense says its mission is "to restore and protect the health of children by eliminating exposures to environmental toxins, holding responsible parties accountable, and establishing safeguards to prevent future harm to children's health". A long-time anti-vaccine activist, Mr Kennedy chaired the group for several years and told attendees at the conference: "We have not taken vaccines away from anybody. We have preserved access. "But we have started asking the questions that you and millions of American parents have been asking for years." Read more from Sky News:Trump demands interest rate be lowered'Reasonable grounds' US committed war crime 'Fear and mistrust' Mr Kennedy's speech comes as the US faces its worst year for measles in 35 years, and has seen seven reported measles-associated deaths in the last two years - more than the combined total of reported deaths over the previous three decades. Josh Shapiro, the governor of Pennsylvania, where officials have reported four measles-associated deaths this year, accused Mr Kennedy of fuelling "fear and mistrust". In a social media post, Mr Shapiro said the health secretary "chose to spend his time today addressing the premier vaccine-denial conference in America", where he "pushed a narrative that continues to stoke fear and mistrust". Last year, Mr Kennedy and Mr Trump addressed what they described as a "meteoric rise" in cases of autism, suggesting the increase was linked to the use of Tylenol - an American-branded version of paracetamol - during pregnancy. The comments were widely condemned by the scientific community, with UK health experts and officials pushing back on the claims, saying there is "no evidence" for it.

News image template
No Writer
Sep 17
Huw Edwards says he may not have been prosecuted if he wasn't famous

Edwards, 65, admitted a charge of "making" indecent images of children and having 41 photographs on WhatsApp, including seven of the most serious type. He was handed a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, in September 2024. In his latest Substack post, Edwards started by saying: "Today is the day. Two years have gone by since my sentencing at Westminster Magistrates' Court." Edwards noted the sentence handed down by the chief magistrate was six months' imprisonment, suspended for two years, adding that his period of rehabilitation is "officially over". He said in the post that 1,000 men are arrested every month in the UK in relation to accessing indecent images. "It is not surprising that individuals are hardly ever singled out for attention by the press," he added. Read more from Sky News:New breast cancer drug now on NHSStadium owner responds to Ed Sheeran row Edwards continued: "I was never involved in online forums, and a forensic examination of my internet history showed that I had never searched for any of this vile material. "Indeed, had I not been such a highly visible public figure, I might not have faced any criminal charges. "That is not my view, I stress - it is the opinion of some of London's most experienced lawyers, and of former Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) staff who have made contact with me privately over the past two years." Edwards was best known for presenting the BBC's News At Ten for decades, delivering some of the biggest stories to the public, including Queen Elizabeth II's death in 2022. In July 2023, a report by The Sun alleged that a "top BBC star" had paid a teenager for sexual pictures, and days later his wife named him as the presenter at the centre of the scandal. During sentencing, Judge Paul Goldspring said he believed Edwards's remorse was genuine and his mental health could have impaired his decision-making. Edwards resigned in April 2024 and was charged in June 2024 after a Metropolitan Police investigation.

News image template
No Writer
Sep 18
British Steel losing £1.3m a day - and there is no 'credible' survival plan yet, MPs warn

In a new report, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) warns that the government has not yet set out concrete plans for how the company will become financially sustainable. It continues to cost £1.3m a day of UK taxpayers' money. Using emergency legislation, the government intervened to prevent the closure of its blast furnaces in April 2025. More than a year later, it could not set out what business model or decarbonisation pathway would put the company on a sustainable footing, the committee concluded. As of March 2026, spending on British Steel was expected to reach £642m by 30 June 2026, including the cost of advisers. The PAC report has demanded more action from the government.. Clive Betts MP, deputy chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said: "Government moved swiftly to save British Steel - all well and good, and our Committee of course welcomes this action as a means of safeguarding a critical part of our national infrastructure and security. "But this was just the beginning. Having brought British Steel onto the taxpayers' books, it is now up to government to explain its plan for its future. "Unfortunately, beyond simply propping up the company with public money, the government was not able to outline such a plan to our inquiry." The PAC report also recommended the government set out a plan to reduce reliance on advisers; set future direction for the company, and remain involved given the importance for national and economic security. The report also said that the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade (BIST) was unable to explain how much of the government's £2.5bn commitment to the steel sector remains available once support for British Steel is taken into account. Read more from Sky News:Council announces record council tax hikeBaby wards to get 'cot cams' after Letby inquiry There is further uncertainty over the long-term future employment for British Steel's 4,052 employees, the report said. The report touched on concerns regarding the government's new tariffs on imported steel, which it said came without "detailed information about which steel products can be sourced from the UK". When asked by the PAC if the tariffs could put small firms out of business, the government said it was "afraid that may well be the case".

News image template
No Writer
Sep 17
Manchester United: What's to blame for latest problems and results increasing scrutiny on Michael Carrick after Carabao Cup exit?

United led 2-0 after just 10 minutes against Brighton on Wednesday night. By full-time, they had lost 3-2, exited the Carabao Cup at the third-round stage for a second successive season and been booed off by their own supporters. It was the first time in 50 years United had lost at Old Trafford after going 2-0 up. They had won 143 of the previous 145 matches in which they had established that advantage. They also failed to register another shot on target after Mason Mount's 2-0 goal until the 76th minute. Transfer Centre LIVE! | Man Utd news & transfers🔴Man Utd fixtures & scores | FREE Man Utd highlights▶️Got Sky? Watch Premier League games LIVE on your phone📱Not got Sky? Latest Sky Sports deals or stream PL games with no contract📺 The defeat leaves Carrick under pressure only months after his interim spell was rewarded with the permanent job. He had won 12 of his 17 matches last season, drawing three and losing two, giving him a 70.6 per cent win rate. This season, his record is two wins, one draw and three defeats from six games - a 33.3 per cent win rate. United have now also matched their joint-worst start to a Premier League season after four games, while their Carabao Cup exit has removed an opportunity for silverware. So what is the main issue at Old Trafford? United are being outrun United's lack of urgency on the pitch has been stark, and the numbers match what we're seeing in matches. United rank 14th in the Premier League for distance covered this season, with 449.1km, but their rankings drop sharply when the intensity of those movements is measured. They are 18th for sprints, with 379, 19th for high-speed runs, with 1,364, 18th for sprints per kilometre covered and 19th for high-speed runs per kilometre. That paints a picture of a team covering ground without doing enough of it at the speeds required to press, recover and defend transitions. It was particularly obvious against Brighton. United's nine changes from the side that started the Manchester derby provided some context, with several players coming into the team after spending time on the bench. But Brighton also made six changes, including four players making their first starts for the club. Jamie Redknapp questioned United's physical condition. "They didn't look fit enough," he said. "I don't know if a lot of them do enough. I saw too many players not running back or not looking fit enough." Leny Yoro's recovery for Brighton's third goal was one example. He was jogging back as Brighton broke, rather than sprinting into a position from which he could make a challenge. It is a concern that stretches beyond one night. If United cannot match opponents for intensity, they are left defending larger spaces and spending longer without the ball. Your views Bomer86: "Why are Brighton fitter and faster than Man Utd? What is happening in training that the players are not fit? They were slower to every ball. No desire, no energy after 10 mins." Ossy: "Fitness/intensity and Carrick's inability to read game state and react accordingly is going to be Man Utd's undoing this season." United have spent, but is the squad balanced? This summer United made seven permanent signings, alongside four loan arrivals, while 13 players left permanently and 10 went out on loan. The headline investment has been concentrated heavily in midfield and attack. Around £85m of that spending started against Brighton in Youri Tielemans and Andrey Santos, while Carlos Baleba - signed from Brighton for around £70m - was watching from the stands. The broader squad remains one of the most valuable in the Premier League. Transfermarkt values United's first-team squad at £791.2m, the fifth-highest figure among the clubs shown, behind Manchester City, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool. However, concerns remain over whether the distribution of that value has provided Carrick with enough tools to work with. United's forwards account for £317.2m of the squad valuation and midfielders another £249.9m. The defensive group is valued at £193.8m, with the goalkeeper position accounting for the remainder. The defence was already an obvious area of concern before the transfer window closed, yet United went into Wednesday's game with two inexperienced centre-backs in Yoro and Ayden Heaven and limited options at full-back. Your views EmmaRachael: "Why do Man Utd persist in buying quantity instead of real quality." Cheese: "Appalling defence please invest in defensive reinforcements." Gazza D: "United haven't backed Carrick. Desperately need two wing-backs of quality and that is evident in what we've seen with Dalot and Mazraoui." Owners and INEOS: Who built this squad? Supporters have repeatedly questioned the direction of the club, particularly after another transfer window in which significant money was spent but defensive reinforcements remained an issue. United have now cycled through several managers since Sir Alex Ferguson's retirement, yet familiar complaints about the squad, recruitment and performances remain. That is why Carrick's position can't be judged in isolation. The manager is responsible for the team on the pitch, but the squad he is selecting was built through decisions made at board and recruitment level. Your views S. Prime09: "United had a real chance to build on last season. The transfer window was so important. But we wouldn't spend over £70m. And all our top targets went some other team." Ziggy: "The club has been lacking a clear plan since Fergie left. They don't know what they're doing." Carrick: From interim hero to man under pressure Carrick's interim spell last season was impressive enough to earn him the permanent job. But it is the nature of the performances that has caused concern as much as the results. United have struggled to control games and Carrick has faced questions over his in-game management and team selection. His nine changes against Brighton left him open to criticism when United's performance deteriorated after the early two-goal burst. He accepted full responsibility for United's abject performance after the game. "We can't accept that as a group. I take responsibility for it," Carrick told Sky Sports. "The performance towards the end of the second half, that's on me." Your views Jefft: "I'm so grateful for Carrick getting us into the top four but I said it then, the club should have said thanks but get in an elite coach who tactically has it." Jon S: "At what point do you stop blaming managers and start blaming players? You can't keep swapping manager after manager after manager." United ignored defensive warning signs Wednesday's game exposed perhaps the clearest squad weakness. Yoro and Heaven formed an inexperienced centre-back pairing and Brighton repeatedly found space around them. For the second goal, Luka Vuskovic won the header ahead of Benjamin Sesko, and the ball fell to Pascal Gross, who had space to finish. Heaven failed to anticipate the danger and Yoro could not prevent the shot. For the third, Yoro was again caught behind the play as Brighton broke. Full-back remains another concern, with Diogo Dalot and Noussair Mazraoui facing criticism for their positioning and distribution - and the depth behind the established defensive options remains questionable. Your views John S: "The gaps between Heaven and Yoro were too big, the full backs were beyond poor and the midfield looks average." HN: "Why would you use an inexperienced back line in a must win game? Nothing against playing young players but pair them with experience." No more cohesion in attack Last season, United had a more settled attacking combination with Matheus Cunha on the left, Bryan Mbeumo through the middle and Amad Diallo on the right. Sesko remained an option introduced off the bench. Rashford's return has altered that balance, with supporters questioning whether the change has affected the team's attacking rhythm. The time without a shot on target against Brighton is a major concern: after the early burst, United could not consistently supply Sesko or create enough pressure to prevent Brighton from taking control. Rashford did have a late chance to equalise but saw his near-post effort saved. Your views Dhanyaal: "Last season Cunha on left and Mbeumo on right and Sesko as number 9 was working. Why's he changed it and put Rashford on left?" Platty7: "Rightly or wrongly the major change from last season is Rashford, he hasn't exactly set the world alight." VOTE: What do you think the biggest issue is at Man Utd?

bottom of page